My love for NPR and Planet Money knows no bounds.
I saw this Carl Kasell little thinker doll as a Pledger Thank You gift in the last public radio pledge drive but we’re still 9months out from a renewal and my husband intelligently reminded me that pledging a bunch more just for the gift was silly.
So I’m super glad you can now buy it in the NPR shop. I don’t need it but I sure do want it. It’s only $17 so maybe I’ll pick it up for my half-birthday in May.
(The picture above is real Carl with the little thinker Carl, in case that needed to be clarified.)
Getting married can cost a fortune. One of the biggest-ticket items is the wedding dress. Recent bride Caitlin Kenney of NPR’s Planet Money wanted to know why her wedding dress was so expensive and how she might have avoided spending so much.
The wedding industrial complex can drive anybody bananas. Amirite?
(Source: Slate)
Do you mind if I take a few minutes to tell you about my son? He has three beautiful sisters but right now I’ll just tell you about him. He is 8 now and he loves anything that involves dirt, any ball, and running around. He still has deliciously long eyelashes and long musician’s fingers; he is learning to play the guitar. He likes to act like he’s older than he is — a couple days ago he asked me if I thought his Nerf basketball set was “old school” and if his next babysitter could be “hot”; whatever that means. (The answer to both is no, by the way.) But every so often, thankfully, my husband and I are reminded that he is still a little boy, like a few weeks ago when he was not feeling well and he came into our room at two in the morning clutching his green stuffed bunny. He came in because he was afraid, and I was reminded that, even at 2 a.m., one of the pleasures of being a parent is to be able to comfort your child when he is afraid.
Can I just tell you? That is why if you are a parent — and frankly even if you aren’t — you should be able to understand why so many people are so shaken and so hurt about the death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Florida. Shot to death (as we talked about previously on the program) while he was walking home from the store in a neighborhood outside Orlando that he was visiting. Shot because a neighbor, a self-appointed neighborhood watch guy named George Zimmerman, decided the teenager looked suspicious and took it upon himself to follow him.
Now I wasn’t there but one thing I do know is that there is already a lot to digest in what we all do know. Like the fact that there had been a series of break-ins in the area, which tends to make people on edge; the fact that the police dispatcher told George Zimmerman to back off and he didn’t; and the fact that witnesses have accused the local police of shaping their statements to fit the shooter’s defense rather than objectively pursuing the facts.
But what I want to focus on today is something we don’t ever seem to talk about: that fact that Trayvon Martin was afraid. Something we know because, according to his family’s lawyer, he was on the phone and told the friend he was being followed by a strange man. That friend told him to run. And he did, toward the house where he was staying. But he never made it.
Why does it never seem to occur to anybody that young black men can be afraid? Let’s face it — when we think about why crime frightens us, doesn’t the person who comes to mind, the person whose victimization we most fear, is probably somebody who looks like our mother, our sister, your wife or girlfriend? But if you think about who is actually most likely to be killed, that victim is far more likely to be a man and far more likely to be a black or brown man.
In 2010, according to the FBI, some 1,800 black people under the age of 22 were murdered. That’s 50 percent more than the total number of whites that age who were killed. But it’s even more depressing when you consider that blacks are just 13 percent of the population. And yes it is true that the people bringing the pain are most likely to look exactly like the people they are hurting.
Case in point: over the weekend in Chicago at least 10 people were killed, at least half believed to be gang-related shootings, including a 6-year-old girl killed in a drive-by. But that is all the more reason why when the innocent suffer, attention must be paid. And also why attention must be paid when the many are forced to wear the cloak of suspicion caused by the acts of the few.
My son is so young now and so innocent, so happy that he can ride his scooter to the new playground down the street. His biggest worry is getting tally marks for forgetting to raise his hand and losing precious minutes of recess. How long will it be before my biggest fear will be having to wait with my heart in my chest every time he walks out the door?
NPR made valentine’s again this year. These are my favorites.
Florida State Sen. Ronda Storms, who introduced a bill to bar welfare funds from being spent on junk food. (via officialssay)
NPR had a piece about this on Morning Edition (by Allison Aubrey): Could Taxes or Food Stamp Restrictions Tame America’s Sweet Tooth?
My thoughts are this:
First and foremost: we can’t police what people eat, no matter how badly we want to. I don’t want to engage in a slippery-slope argument, but what exactly will the criteria be to ban what people eat? Just chips? What about tortilla chips or pita chips? Could folks buy all the ingredients to make brownies but not a pre-made mix of brownies (Michael Pollan rule #39 anyone?)? Would we ban canned vegetables (because fresh or frozen is way better). [The same argument is being made by food companies lobbyists in regard to the potential policy taxing certain foods.]
I get that for some reason people are annoyed/irritated/offended when they see someone buying oreos with Food Stamps but I have bad news: its none of our damn business what people are eating (you know, so long as it is food).
Yeah, it’d be nice if people, either on food stamps or buying with their own cash ate better or just less sugar. There are serious long term side effects that we all pay for when folks of any kind eat poorly all the time. You know, I am not thrilled about the fact that the money I pay toward my health insurance partially goes to pay for gastric bypasses. I mean, basically someone is just being physically forced to eat less as opposed to the much less expensive procedure of “just eating less”. I am frustrated that there are folks who end up with preventable type-2 diabetes due to their lifestyle choices.* But I’m not going to knock a cupcake out of someone’s hand before it reaches his/her mouth and I’m not going to ask them if they really need that ice cream that is in their grocery cart.
And maybe you are making the argument Ronda Storms is making, that because people are receiving food stamps at the government’s expense that that means we get to nanny them. But everyone receives financial benefits (e.g. tax breaks) from the government but maybe its not as direct as food stamps**. So, yeah, I am buying my ice cream with my “hard-earned money” but its with funds I have thanks to my tax-return or the hundreds of dollars I save every month being in the IBR program which is subsidized by the government.
*I know not everyone who has type 2 diabetes has it because of lifestyle choices.
**There is a specific term for this kind of help but I’m saving that whole explanation for another post.
by Peggy Lowe, NPR
All I could think about as I was listening to this last Thursday was this This American Life Episode-Act One. These two pieces together paint such hilariously different pictures.
By Jon Hamilton, NPR
As a non-drug user and highly anxious person, I have always wondered what makes someone try a drug that is obviously addictive. Have they not seen Trainspotting or Requiem for a Dream? There is rarely such a thing as “trying,” in that these drugs are so addictive it’s basically like taking a one-way flight whilst leaving your wallet at home. It’s pretty hard to come back. As such, I found this article to be an interesting read, personally and professionally.
And fear not: researchers are also looking at how to combat this issue and not just explain it away.
“The new study shows it’s possible to identify people who have inherited a susceptibility to these sorts of problems, Volkow says. And it should help researchers figure out how to help susceptible people strengthen their self-control, she says.”